sinz 2025-12-28 09:09 p.m.those were not the only grounds mentioned in the motion
"during a discussion on December 28, 2025, Judge imnotRummy admitted on the
record that he was appointing JamesGardai to the case not because of the legal
merits, but to fulfill a “conditional vacate” agreement between the Judge and that
specific attorney. The Judge explicitly stated: “I’m resigning soon... and I’d like Mr.
Gardai to complete the terms of his agreement.”
Using an active civil case as a vehicle to satisfy an administrative or private
“deal” between the Judge and another attorney—completely external to the rights of
the litigants—is a violation of the principle that judicial office should not be used to
advance private interests. This creates a bias where the Judge’s goal is closing a deal
rather than adjudicating the law."